PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOHA vs. NRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOHA vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LOHA

1D
-0.59%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NRSH

1D
-4.97%
1M
0.02%
YTD
39.61%
6M
36.75%
1Y
51.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOHA vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LOHA and NRSH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2026

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOHA vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOHA

NRSH
NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOHA vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LOHA vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOHANRSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.62

0.96

-1.59

Drawdowns

LOHA vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.08%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and NRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOHANRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-24.01%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-5.62%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-5.61%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

Volatility

LOHA vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOHANRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

24.97%

-13.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.84%

21.75%

-9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.84%

21.75%

-9.91%

LOHA vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOHA vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

LOHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM202520242023
LOHA
Roundhill HALO ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
0.30%0.42%0.90%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOHA and NRSH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LOHA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LOHA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for LOHA.

LOHA tracks Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.75% for NRSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOHA and NRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer