LOGS.DE vs. EZA
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and EZA (iShares MSCI South Africa ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while EZA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE returned 12.53%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for EZA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EZA.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. EZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LOGS.DE is traded in EUR, while EZA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EZA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 30.23% return, which is significantly higher than EZA's -1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed EZA with an annualized return of 12.53%, while EZA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 30.23%
- 6M
- 32.47%
- 1Y
- 58.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 21.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
EZA
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 30.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
LOGS.DE vs. EZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 30.23% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.07% | -21.75% | 11.25% | -0.78% | 1.96% |
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | -1.31% | 54.41% | 14.23% | -1.54% | 0.70% | 15.98% | -13.00% | 12.31% | -21.73% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and EZA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.35 |
The correlation between LOGS.DE and EZA shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. EZA — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
EZA
LOGS.DE vs. EZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOGS.DE | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.20 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.57 | 1.42 | +7.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.33 | 3.78 | +24.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. EZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.41%, smaller than the maximum EZA drawdown of -59.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and EZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.41% | -59.54% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -21.63% | +14.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -21.63% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -30.47% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.41% | -56.33% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -16.25% | +10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -16.70% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 8.12% | -6.07% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. EZA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 6.21%, while iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 10.31% | -4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 24.82% | -11.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 29.45% | -12.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 26.15% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 29.61% | -5.55% |
LOGS.DE vs. EZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EZA's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. EZA - Dividend Comparison
LOGS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 6.34% | 6.16% | 7.26% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and EZA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EZA.
LOGS.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while EZA is Emerging Markets Equities. LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.59% for EZA.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and EZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer