LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WDNR.DE).
LOGS.DE and WDNR.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LOGS.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. It was launched on Oct 25, 2006. WDNR.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg BioEnergy ESG. It was launched on Jan 31, 2018. Both LOGS.DE and WDNR.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 34.48% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
WDNR.DE Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 29.90% | 10.93% | -16.29% | -1.60% | 53.34% | 50.49% | -37.73% | 13.17% | -12.36% | -8.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 34.48% return, which is significantly higher than WDNR.DE's 29.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed WDNR.DE with an annualized return of 13.45%, while WDNR.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.49% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 12.10%
- YTD
- 34.48%
- 6M
- 44.44%
- 1Y
- 76.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- 22.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
WDNR.DE
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 10.81%
- YTD
- 29.90%
- 6M
- 34.71%
- 1Y
- 49.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 16.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WDNR.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
WDNR.DE
LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WDNR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | WDNR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.79 | 2.70 | +1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.07 | 3.51 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.49 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.56 | 7.89 | +4.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.26 | 31.68 | +25.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | WDNR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79 | 2.70 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.76 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.32 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and WDNR.DE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor WDNR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, smaller than the maximum WDNR.DE drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and WDNR.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | WDNR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -62.27% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.51% | -11.53% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -40.22% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | -61.84% | +5.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.24% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -16.88% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.76% | -0.24% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 5.38%, while Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WDNR.DE) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDNR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | WDNR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 7.27% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 12.17% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 18.19% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 22.73% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 27.07% | -2.95% |