LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE returned 12.14%/yr vs 7.43%/yr for AMEL.DE. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEL.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 31.31% return, which is significantly higher than AMEL.DE's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGS.DE has outperformed AMEL.DE with an annualized return of 12.14%, while AMEL.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.43% annualized return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 10.83% | 38.06% | -22.22% | 28.09% | 16.34% | -3.21% | -21.29% | 20.69% | -3.27% | 8.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and AMEL.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LOGS.DE and AMEL.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
AMEL.DE
LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.33 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 3.16 | +6.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 9.66 | +24.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 1.90 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.45 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.29 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.12 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, which is greater than AMEL.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and AMEL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -52.69% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -10.86% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -25.38% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | -25.38% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | -51.31% | -5.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -10.86% | +6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -17.89% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 3.57% | -1.70% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) at 5.32%. This indicates that LOGS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 5.32% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 15.30% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 18.10% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 20.90% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 25.27% | -1.18% |
LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor AMEL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and AMEL.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
LOGS.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while AMEL.DE is Latin America Equities. LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.20% for AMEL.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and AMEL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer