LOGO vs. BPH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LOGO (Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Brands, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. LOGO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

LOGO vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LOGO

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: -3.54%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 1Y: -1.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOGO vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF	-2.13%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LOGO and BPH is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.34

Return for Risk

LOGO vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOGO

LOGO Risk / Return Rank: 9
LOGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LOGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LOGO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
LOGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LOGO Martin Ratio Rank: 9

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOGO vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOGO	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.14	—	—

Drawdowns

LOGO vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOGO drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGO and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOGO	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.34%	-15.58%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.29%	-6.78%	-2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-6.73%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LOGO	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	28.00%	-11.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.60%	28.00%	-12.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	28.00%	-12.40%

LOGO vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOGO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOGO vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

LOGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.

Position	TTM
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.52%
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOGO and BPH in my portfolio?

LOGO and BPH have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LOGO or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOGO or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for LOGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOGO or BPH?

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for LOGO.

What is the main difference between LOGO and BPH?

LOGO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Brands and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for LOGO and 0.19% for BPH.