PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOCFX vs. FICVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOCFX vs. FICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOCFX achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly lower than FICVX's 14.07% return.


LOCFX

1D
2.95%
1M
-3.66%
6M
5.82%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.56%

FICVX

1D
3.01%
1M
-3.63%
6M
8.61%
YTD
14.07%
1Y
25.29%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
11.84%
ALL TIME*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LOCFX vs. FICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOCFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3
12.04%22.43%14.00%7.30%-23.12%1.40%64.47%25.07%-6.42%10.04%
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
14.07%18.28%8.11%11.39%-15.38%9.93%42.46%28.58%-1.31%5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LOCFX and FICVX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017

0.90

The correlation between LOCFX and FICVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOCFX vs. FICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOCFX
LOCFX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LOCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LOCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FICVX
FICVX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOCFX vs. FICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOCFXFICVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.02

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

7.94

-0.22

LOCFX vs. FICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the FICVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOCFX and FICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOCFX vs. FICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCFX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, which is greater than FICVX's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCFX and FICVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOCFXFICVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.29%

-25.06%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-11.70%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-18.88%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-24.20%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.50%

-9.04%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-5.62%

-5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.97%

-0.09%

Volatility

LOCFX vs. FICVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) is 5.76%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that LOCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOCFXFICVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

6.07%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

13.98%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

17.00%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

13.92%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

13.86%

+0.30%

LOCFX vs. FICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOCFX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FICVX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOCFX vs. FICVX - Dividend Comparison

LOCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than FICVX's 9.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
9.16%11.38%2.02%2.12%3.73%20.65%10.73%3.28%9.85%4.09%4.90%10.39%
LOCFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3
1.39%1.86%2.29%2.06%2.72%18.36%16.20%8.75%5.02%2.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, LOCFX and FICVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FICVX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to LOCFX (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOCFX dropped -33.29% vs FICVX's -25.06%.

FICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOCFX and FICVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer