PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICVX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICVX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICVX achieves a 24.00% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FICVX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.16%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


FICVX

1D
1.22%
1M
3.09%
YTD
24.00%
6M
21.62%
1Y
41.80%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
13.16%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICVX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
24.00%18.28%8.11%11.39%-15.38%9.93%42.46%28.58%-1.31%9.03%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FICVX and VOO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.84

The correlation between FICVX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICVX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICVX
FICVX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICVX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FICVXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.89

3.02

+2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.34

13.58

+7.76

FICVX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICVX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FICVX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICVX drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICVX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICVXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-33.99%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-8.90%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-18.69%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.20%

-24.52%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.06%

-33.99%

+8.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.74%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-3.68%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.98%

-0.01%

Volatility

FICVX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that FICVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICVXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

4.60%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

9.73%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

12.39%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.70%

16.90%

-3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

18.05%

-4.29%

FICVX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICVX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICVX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FICVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
8.91%11.38%2.02%2.12%3.73%20.65%10.73%3.28%9.85%4.09%4.90%10.39%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICVX and VOO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICVX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICVX dropped -25.06% vs VOO's -33.99%.

FICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICVX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer