PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOAR vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOAR vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOAR achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 80.96% return.


LOAR

1D
-0.92%
1M
13.91%
YTD
4.43%
6M
1.82%
1Y
-12.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASML

1D
-0.02%
1M
18.15%
YTD
80.96%
6M
83.17%
1Y
157.02%
3Y*
41.76%
5Y*
24.38%
10Y*
36.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOAR vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LOAR
Loar Holdings Inc.
4.43%-8.00%64.24%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
80.96%56.51%-21.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LOAR and ASML is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2024

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOAR:

$6.79B

ASML:

$744.11B

EPS

LOAR:

$0.71

ASML:

€25.86

PE Ratio

LOAR:

100.15

ASML:

65.06

PEG Ratio

LOAR:

0.45

ASML:

4.28

PS Ratio

LOAR:

12.66

ASML:

19.33

PB Ratio

LOAR:

5.76

ASML:

31.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOAR:

$537.71M

ASML:

€33.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOAR:

$273.34M

ASML:

€17.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

LOAR:

$152.16M

ASML:

€12.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOAR vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOAR
LOAR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LOAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LOAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOAR vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOARASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.49

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

8.85

-9.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

23.82

-24.39

LOAR vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOAR Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOAR and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOAR vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOAR drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAR and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOARASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.97%

-90.00%

+44.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.91%

-17.85%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.63%

-0.02%

-28.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.71%

-28.11%

+8.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.87%

6.62%

+15.25%

Volatility

LOAR vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) is 11.85%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 16.29%. This indicates that LOAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOARASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

16.29%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.76%

34.37%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.74%

43.11%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.92%

42.53%

+7.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.92%

38.77%

+11.15%

Dividends

LOAR vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

LOAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.46%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
LOAR
Loar Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LOAR vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loar Holdings Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
156.09M
8.77B
(LOAR) Total Revenue
(ASML) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LOAR values in USD, ASML values in EUR

LOAR vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Loar Holdings Inc. and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%54.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
50.8%
53.0%
Portfolio components
LOAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loar Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.24M and revenue of 156.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.8%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

LOAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loar Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 33.52M and revenue of 156.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

LOAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loar Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 11.14M and revenue of 156.09M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOAR and ASML have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASML has higher volatility (16.29%) compared to LOAR (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAR dropped -45.97% vs ASML's -90.00%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOAR and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer