LOAR vs. TOST

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LOAR (Loar Holdings Inc.) and TOST (Toast, Inc.) are both stocks. LOAR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while TOST operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, LOAR returned -28.40% vs -39.78% for TOST. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LOAR vs. TOST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) and Toast, Inc. (TOST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOAR achieves a -7.32% return, which is significantly higher than TOST's -29.40% return.

LOAR

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 13.37%
• YTD: -7.32%
• 6M: -7.73%
• 1Y: -28.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TOST

• 1D: -4.86%
• 1M: -14.76%
• YTD: -29.40%
• 6M: -28.72%
• 1Y: -39.78%
• 3Y*: 5.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOAR vs. TOST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LOAR Loar Holdings Inc.	-7.32%	-8.00%	51.45%
TOST Toast, Inc.	-29.40%	-2.58%	57.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LOAR and TOST is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2024	0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap LOAR : $6.03B TOST : $15.09B
EPS LOAR : $0.71 TOST : $0.68
PE Ratio LOAR : 88.88 TOST : 36.86
PEG Ratio LOAR : 0.40 TOST : 0.02
PS Ratio LOAR : 11.24 TOST : 2.36
PB Ratio LOAR : 5.11 TOST : 7.58
Total Revenue (TTM) LOAR : $537.71M TOST : $6.45B
Gross Profit (TTM) LOAR : $273.34M TOST : $1.69B
EBITDA (TTM) LOAR : $152.16M TOST : $430.00M

Return for Risk

LOAR vs. TOST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOAR

LOAR Risk / Return Rank: 13
LOAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
LOAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LOAR Omega Ratio Rank: 14
LOAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
LOAR Martin Ratio Rank: 14

TOST

TOST Risk / Return Rank: 10
TOST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TOST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TOST Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TOST Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TOST Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOAR vs. TOST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) and Toast, Inc. (TOST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOAR	TOST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	-0.87	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.84	-1.13	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.86	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	-0.73	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	-1.26	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOAR vs. TOST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOAR Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the TOST Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOAR and TOST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOAR	TOST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.71	-0.87	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	-0.29	+0.55

Drawdowns

LOAR vs. TOST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOAR drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, smaller than the maximum TOST drawdown of -80.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAR and TOST.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOAR	TOST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.97%	-80.56%	+34.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.58%	-54.71%	+14.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-54.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.66%	-61.56%	+24.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.45%	-57.91%	+38.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.21%	31.58%	-8.37%

Volatility

LOAR vs. TOST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) is 14.25%, while Toast, Inc. (TOST) has a volatility of 22.20%. This indicates that LOAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOAR	TOST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.25%	22.20%	-7.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.98%	36.66%	-3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.28%	46.02%	-5.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.74%	61.37%	-11.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.74%	61.37%	-11.63%

Dividends

LOAR vs. TOST - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOAR nor TOST has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LOAR vs. TOST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Loar Holdings Inc. and Toast, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LOAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loar Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.24M and revenue of 156.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.8%.

TOST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toast, Inc. reported a gross profit of 447.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

LOAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loar Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 33.52M and revenue of 156.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.

TOST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toast, Inc. reported an operating income of 110.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

LOAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loar Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 11.14M and revenue of 156.09M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.

TOST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toast, Inc. reported a net income of 126.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOAR and TOST in my portfolio?

LOAR and TOST have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOAR or TOST?

TOST has higher volatility (22.20%) compared to LOAR (14.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAR dropped -45.97% vs TOST's -80.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.