LOAN vs. MITT
LOAN (Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.) and MITT (AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, LOAN returned 7.47%/yr vs -6.83%/yr for MITT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOAN vs. MITT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LOAN having a -3.60% return and MITT slightly lower at -3.68%. Over the past 10 years, LOAN has outperformed MITT with an annualized return of 7.47%, while MITT has yielded a comparatively lower -6.83% annualized return.
LOAN
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- -3.60%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- 1Y
- -8.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
MITT
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- -6.83%
LOAN vs. MITT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOAN Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. | -3.60% | -9.37% | 22.47% | 2.12% | 5.67% | 13.92% | -10.36% | 21.90% | 1.46% | -16.15% |
MITT AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. | -3.68% | 42.79% | 17.10% | 35.77% | -41.03% | 24.12% | -80.68% | 8.94% | -6.22% | 23.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOAN and MITT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
LOAN:
$50.07M
MITT:
$252.00M
LOAN:
$0.44
MITT:
$1.09
LOAN:
9.99
MITT:
7.29
LOAN:
5.91
MITT:
0.50
LOAN:
1.16
MITT:
0.78
LOAN:
$8.47M
MITT:
$492.91M
LOAN:
$6.80M
MITT:
$464.48M
LOAN:
$5.02M
MITT:
$457.33M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOAN vs. MITT — Risk / Return Rank
LOAN
MITT
LOAN vs. MITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOAN | MITT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.14 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 0.96 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 2.29 | -2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOAN vs. MITT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOAN drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, roughly equal to the maximum MITT drawdown of -91.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAN and MITT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOAN | MITT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.93% | -91.49% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.10% | -20.74% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.22% | -25.77% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -69.76% | +37.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.16% | -91.49% | +32.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -71.38% | +53.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -38.78% | -7.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.15% | 8.68% | +5.47% |
Volatility
LOAN vs. MITT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) is 4.21%, while AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that LOAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MITT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOAN | MITT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 6.80% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 20.25% | -6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.68% | 27.82% | -6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 35.21% | -9.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.41% | 67.65% | -33.24% |
Dividends
LOAN vs. MITT - Dividend Comparison
LOAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.39%, less than MITT's 11.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOAN Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. | 10.39% | 9.89% | 8.21% | 9.05% | 9.38% | 8.82% | 8.06% | 7.55% | 8.54% | 6.97% | 4.93% | 9.68% |
MITT AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. | 11.21% | 9.98% | 11.28% | 11.34% | 15.25% | 7.90% | 1.02% | 12.32% | 12.40% | 10.52% | 11.10% | 17.72% |
Financials
LOAN vs. MITT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. and AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LOAN vs. MITT - Profitability Comparison
LOAN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.70M and revenue of 2.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.4%.
MITT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.82M and revenue of 130.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.9%.
LOAN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.
MITT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 103.79M and revenue of 130.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 79.8%.
LOAN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in a net margin of 61.6%.
MITT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -3.56M and revenue of 130.09M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOAN and MITT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MITT has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to LOAN (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAN dropped -90.93% vs MITT's -91.49%.
MITT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOAN and MITT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer