PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNT vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LNT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LNT having a 16.47% return and QQQ slightly higher at 17.11%. Over the past 10 years, LNT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.98%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.29% annualized return.


LNT

1D
-2.31%
1M
1.36%
6M
13.25%
YTD
16.47%
1Y
24.32%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.98%

QQQ

1D
-0.27%
1M
-3.42%
6M
16.12%
YTD
17.11%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
24.43%
5Y*
15.64%
10Y*
21.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
16.47%13.52%19.54%-3.84%-7.44%22.86%-3.16%33.43%2.37%16.05%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.11%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LNT and QQQ is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.27

The correlation between LNT and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNT
LNT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.48

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

8.85

-0.62

LNT vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNT and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNT drawdown since its inception was -51.66%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNT and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.66%

-82.97%

+31.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-11.96%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-22.77%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.60%

-35.12%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.54%

-35.12%

+1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-3.70%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-32.66%

+23.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.35%

-0.39%

Volatility

LNT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) is 6.15%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that LNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

8.08%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

15.42%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

18.60%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

22.80%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

22.44%

-1.23%

Dividends

LNT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

LNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than QQQ's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
2.80%3.12%3.25%3.53%3.10%2.62%2.95%2.60%3.17%2.96%3.10%3.52%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.42%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


LNT and QQQ have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to LNT (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNT dropped -51.66% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNT and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer