LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO
LNR.TO (Linamar Corporation) and ALC.TO (Algoma Central Corporation) are both stocks. LNR.TO operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while ALC.TO operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LNR.TO returned 8.17%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for ALC.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNR.TO achieves a 27.50% return, which is significantly higher than ALC.TO's 20.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LNR.TO has underperformed ALC.TO with an annualized return of 8.17%, while ALC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.
LNR.TO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 15.63%
- YTD
- 27.50%
- 6M
- 34.71%
- 1Y
- 69.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
ALC.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 44.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNR.TO Linamar Corporation | 27.50% | 48.67% | -9.93% | 5.90% | -17.08% | 12.16% | 38.52% | 9.64% | -37.62% | 27.84% |
ALC.TO Algoma Central Corporation | 20.11% | 33.98% | 4.20% | -7.11% | 11.32% | 27.43% | 33.75% | 12.11% | -18.66% | 34.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNR.TO and ALC.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 1986 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
LNR.TO:
CA$6.27B
ALC.TO:
CA$903.45M
LNR.TO:
CA$10.50
ALC.TO:
CA$4.15
LNR.TO:
10.01
ALC.TO:
5.36
LNR.TO:
0.36
ALC.TO:
0.24
LNR.TO:
0.59
ALC.TO:
1.16
LNR.TO:
0.99
ALC.TO:
0.90
LNR.TO:
CA$10.64B
ALC.TO:
CA$781.64M
LNR.TO:
CA$1.57B
ALC.TO:
CA$284.71M
LNR.TO:
CA$1.60B
ALC.TO:
CA$175.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LNR.TO
ALC.TO
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO) and Algoma Central Corporation (ALC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LNR.TO | ALC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 2.95 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | 8.16 | +6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LNR.TO | ALC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.89 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.63 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.64 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.07 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNR.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.63%, roughly equal to the maximum ALC.TO drawdown of -94.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNR.TO and ALC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNR.TO | ALC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.63% | -94.53% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.14% | -15.25% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.82% | -15.25% | -26.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.19% | -15.25% | -28.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.30% | -48.84% | -19.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.59% | +6.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.57% | -52.66% | +15.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 5.50% | -0.79% |
Volatility
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO) and Algoma Central Corporation (ALC.TO) have volatilities of 8.73% and 8.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNR.TO | ALC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 8.53% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.55% | 20.17% | +5.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.20% | 23.74% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.38% | 19.44% | +11.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.49% | 22.35% | +12.14% |
Dividends
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO - Dividend Comparison
LNR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than ALC.TO's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALC.TO Algoma Central Corporation | 3.68% | 4.23% | 5.14% | 13.85% | 3.73% | 3.99% | 22.63% | 8.90% | 3.08% | 2.00% | 2.29% | 2.00% |
LNR.TO Linamar Corporation | 1.10% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 1.37% | 1.31% | 0.91% | 0.53% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 0.54% |
Financials
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Linamar Corporation and Algoma Central Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNR.TO vs. ALC.TO - Profitability Comparison
LNR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linamar Corporation reported a gross profit of 452.96M and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
ALC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Central Corporation reported a gross profit of -16.27M and revenue of 127.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.7%.
LNR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linamar Corporation reported an operating income of 288.90M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
ALC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Central Corporation reported an operating income of -30.01M and revenue of 127.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
LNR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linamar Corporation reported a net income of 221.37M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
ALC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Central Corporation reported a net income of 2.22M and revenue of 127.78M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNR.TO and ALC.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LNR.TO and ALC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer