PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNR.TO vs. MGA.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LNR.TOMGA.TO
YTD Return-6.54%-15.85%
1Y Return-0.33%9.52%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.27%2.55%
5Y Return (Ann)7.95%32.54%
10Y Return (Ann)1.27%11.20%
Sharpe Ratio-0.010.17
Sortino Ratio0.200.77
Omega Ratio1.021.08
Calmar Ratio-0.010.12
Martin Ratio-0.030.39
Ulcer Index8.00%29.25%
Daily Std Dev27.03%66.65%
Max Drawdown-92.64%-99.36%
Current Drawdown-29.99%-95.57%

Fundamentals


LNR.TOMGA.TO
Market CapCA$3.79BCA$127.98M
EPSCA$9.43CA$0.01
PE Ratio6.2734.50
PEG Ratio1.080.00
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$8.02BCA$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$1.14B-CA$80.00K
EBITDA (TTM)CA$1.13B-CA$2.26M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LNR.TO and MGA.TO is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LNR.TO vs. MGA.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LNR.TO achieves a -6.54% return, which is significantly higher than MGA.TO's -15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, LNR.TO has underperformed MGA.TO with an annualized return of 1.27%, while MGA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-8.93%
-14.59%
LNR.TO
MGA.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNR.TO vs. MGA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO) and Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNR.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNR.TO, currently valued at -0.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNR.TO, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LNR.TO, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNR.TO, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LNR.TO, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.06
MGA.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MGA.TO, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MGA.TO, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MGA.TO, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MGA.TO, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MGA.TO, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.36

LNR.TO vs. MGA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNR.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the MGA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNR.TO and MGA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-0.02
0.16
LNR.TO
MGA.TO

Dividends

LNR.TO vs. MGA.TO - Dividend Comparison

LNR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while MGA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LNR.TO
Linamar Corporation
1.64%1.37%1.31%0.91%0.53%0.98%1.06%0.66%0.69%0.54%0.56%0.72%
MGA.TO
Mega Uranium Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LNR.TO vs. MGA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNR.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.64%, smaller than the maximum MGA.TO drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNR.TO and MGA.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-36.97%
-96.38%
LNR.TO
MGA.TO

Volatility

LNR.TO vs. MGA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO) is 5.86%, while Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA.TO) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that LNR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
5.86%
17.31%
LNR.TO
MGA.TO

Financials

LNR.TO vs. MGA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Linamar Corporation and Mega Uranium Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items