PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALC.TO vs. BN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ALC.TO vs. BN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Algoma Central Corporation (ALC.TO) and Brookfield Corp (BN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ALC.TO vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALC.TO
Algoma Central Corporation
13.35%33.98%4.20%-7.11%11.32%27.43%33.75%12.11%-18.66%34.21%
BN
Brookfield Corp
-9.94%15.01%56.56%25.77%-30.16%47.95%7.15%45.17%-3.08%25.30%
Different Trading Currencies

ALC.TO is traded in CAD, while BN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALC.TO:

CA$860.44M

BN:

$96.43B

EPS

ALC.TO:

CA$3.52

BN:

$0.55

PE Ratio

ALC.TO:

6.02

BN:

73.62

PS Ratio

ALC.TO:

1.13

BN:

1.26

PB Ratio

ALC.TO:

0.85

BN:

2.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALC.TO:

CA$761.06M

BN:

$76.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALC.TO:

CA$389.56M

BN:

$29.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALC.TO:

CA$167.50M

BN:

$32.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALC.TO achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ALC.TO has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 13.04%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.


ALC.TO

1D
0.52%
1M
-11.85%
YTD
13.35%
6M
30.86%
1Y
44.40%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
13.04%

BN

1D
0.53%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-9.94%
6M
-9.95%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
25.33%
5Y*
14.53%
10Y*
14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Algoma Central Corporation

Brookfield Corp

Return for Risk

ALC.TO vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALC.TO
ALC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ALC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ALC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BN
BN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALC.TO vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Algoma Central Corporation (ALC.TO) and Brookfield Corp (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALC.TOBNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

0.34

+1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

0.67

+1.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.09

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

0.59

+2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.58

1.73

+8.85

ALC.TO vs. BN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALC.TO and BN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALC.TOBNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.34

+1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.51

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.53

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.75

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between ALC.TO and BN is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ALC.TO vs. BN - Dividend Comparison

ALC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than BN's 0.61% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALC.TO
Algoma Central Corporation
3.82%4.23%5.14%13.85%3.73%3.99%22.63%8.90%3.08%2.00%2.29%2.00%
BN
Brookfield Corp
0.61%0.52%0.56%0.70%1.44%1.12%1.55%1.11%1.56%1.29%1.58%1.50%

Drawdowns

ALC.TO vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALC.TO drawdown since its inception was -82.93%, which is greater than BN's maximum drawdown of -46.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALC.TO and BN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ALC.TOBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.93%

-82.22%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.25%

-22.05%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.25%

-41.85%

+26.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.84%

-51.42%

+2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.85%

-17.00%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-28.61%

+4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

7.48%

-3.30%

Volatility

ALC.TO vs. BN - Volatility Comparison

Algoma Central Corporation (ALC.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to Brookfield Corp (BN) at 9.81%. This indicates that ALC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ALC.TOBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.48%

9.81%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.23%

21.33%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

32.86%

-9.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

28.52%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

27.73%

-5.46%

Financials

ALC.TO vs. BN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Algoma Central Corporation and Brookfield Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
214.11M
21.18B
(ALC.TO) Total Revenue
(BN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ALC.TO values in CAD, BN values in USD

ALC.TO vs. BN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Algoma Central Corporation and Brookfield Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
23.2%
42.1%
Portfolio components
ALC.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Algoma Central Corporation reported a gross profit of 49.59M and revenue of 214.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.2%.

BN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported a gross profit of 8.91B and revenue of 21.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.

ALC.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Algoma Central Corporation reported an operating income of 29.95M and revenue of 214.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

BN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported an operating income of 8.89B and revenue of 21.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.9%.

ALC.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Algoma Central Corporation reported a net income of 93.99M and revenue of 214.11M, resulting in a net margin of 43.9%.

BN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported a net income of 743.00M and revenue of 21.18B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.