PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNR.TO vs. BKFKY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO) and P/F Bakkafrost (BKFKY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LNR.TO is traded in CAD, while BKFKY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BKFKY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNR.TO achieves a 25.05% return, which is significantly higher than BKFKY's -6.62% return.


LNR.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.61%
6M
17.90%
YTD
25.05%
1Y
57.17%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
7.84%
ALL TIME*
12.21%

BKFKY

1D
-0.13%
1M
-3.14%
6M
-15.40%
YTD
-6.62%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LNR.TO
Linamar Corporation
25.05%48.67%-9.93%5.90%9.10%
BKFKY
P/F Bakkafrost
-6.62%-22.63%26.28%15.45%-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LNR.TO and BKFKY is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2022

-0.03

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNR.TO
LNR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LNR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LNR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BKFKY
BKFKY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BKFKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKFKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKFKY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BKFKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKFKY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO) and P/F Bakkafrost (BKFKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNR.TOBKFKYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

0.66

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

1.71

+9.94

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the BKFKY Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNR.TO and BKFKY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNR.TO drawdown since its inception was -91.70%, which is greater than BKFKY's maximum drawdown of -37.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNR.TO and BKFKY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNR.TOBKFKYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.70%

-37.90%

-53.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.14%

-18.42%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.82%

-37.90%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-29.75%

+27.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.76%

-14.33%

-11.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

8.17%

-3.25%

Volatility

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO) is 8.59%, while P/F Bakkafrost (BKFKY) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that LNR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKFKY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNR.TOBKFKYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.59%

9.08%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.29%

19.13%

+7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.64%

28.24%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.38%

34.11%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.18%

34.11%

+0.07%

Dividends

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY - Dividend Comparison

LNR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than BKFKY's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKFKY
P/F Bakkafrost
1.28%2.78%1.39%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LNR.TO
Linamar Corporation
1.13%1.35%1.76%1.37%1.31%0.91%0.53%0.98%1.06%0.66%0.69%0.54%

Financials

LNR.TO vs. BKFKY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Linamar Corporation and P/F Bakkafrost. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.94B
(LNR.TO) Total Revenue
(BKFKY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LNR.TO values in CAD, BKFKY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


LNR.TO and BKFKY have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNR.TO and BKFKY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer