LNOK vs. ARMG
LNOK (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LNOK charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
LNOK vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LNOK
- 1D
- -13.95%
- 1M
- -52.49%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- -13.62%
- 1M
- -47.93%
- 6M
- 391.37%
- YTD
- 439.65%
- 1Y
- 123.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LNOK vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LNOK Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF | 163.98% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 468.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNOK and ARMG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNOK vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
LNOK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARMG
LNOK vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF (LNOK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNOK | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNOK vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNOK drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNOK and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNOK | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.64% | -80.28% | +27.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.64% | -50.78% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -51.57% | +41.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 39.02% | — |
Volatility
LNOK vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNOK | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 62.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 119.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.16% | 142.31% | -10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 132.16% | 143.62% | -11.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 132.16% | 143.62% | -11.46% |
LNOK vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNOK has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNOK vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
LNOK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.90% | 4.86% |
LNOK Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNOK and ARMG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LNOK.
ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for LNOK.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LNOK and 0.75% for ARMG.
Find the right allocation for LNOK and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer