LNOK vs. XDSQ
LNOK (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LNOK charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
LNOK vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LNOK
- 1D
- -11.95%
- 1M
- -53.04%
- 6M
- 61.09%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 11.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.20M | $13.35M | $27.15M | |
| $1.36M | $887.88K | $477.49K |
LNOK vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LNOK Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF | 63.84% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNOK and XDSQ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNOK vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
LNOK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDSQ
LNOK vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF (LNOK) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNOK | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNOK vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNOK drawdown since its inception was -70.61%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNOK and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNOK | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.61% | -26.06% | -44.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.61% | -1.97% | -68.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -4.84% | -11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility
LNOK vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNOK | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 135.30% | 10.68% | +124.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 135.30% | 15.26% | +120.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.30% | 14.94% | +120.36% |
LNOK vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNOK has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNOK vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither LNOK nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNOK and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LNOK.
LNOK and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LNOK and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for LNOK and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer