LNOIX vs. PUDZX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LNOIX (Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund) and PUDZX (PGIM Real Assets Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, LNOIX returned 4.91%/yr vs 6.84%/yr for PUDZX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LNOIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PUDZX.

Performance

LNOIX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNOIX achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LNOIX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 4.91%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.84% annualized return.

LNOIX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 5.09%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 13.72%
• 3Y*: 7.45%
• 5Y*: 3.04%
• 10Y*: 4.91%

PUDZX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 21.27%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 6.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNOIX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LNOIX Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund	5.09%	9.40%	1.50%	11.87%	-14.51%	8.43%	8.21%	15.32%	-5.05%	9.48%
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	12.74%	13.40%	8.61%	3.26%	-2.76%	18.49%	4.84%	16.29%	-9.20%	6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LNOIX and PUDZX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between LNOIX and PUDZX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LNOIX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNOIX

LNOIX Risk / Return Rank: 58
LNOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LNOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LNOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
LNOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
LNOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

PUDZX

PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 88
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNOIX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LNOIX	PUDZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.85	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.89	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.53	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	6.00	-3.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.88	22.02	-10.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LNOIX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNOIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNOIX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNOIX	PUDZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.85	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.75	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.71	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.54	+0.02

Drawdowns

LNOIX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNOIX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, smaller than the maximum PUDZX drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNOIX and PUDZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNOIX	PUDZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.03%	-21.53%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	-3.56%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.50%	-8.20%	-8.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.03%	-17.98%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.03%	-21.53%	+2.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-2.37%	+1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-5.26%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	0.97%	+0.20%

Volatility

LNOIX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) have volatilities of 2.11% and 2.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LNOIX	PUDZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.11%	2.05%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.13%	6.08%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.47%	7.49%	-1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.49%	10.53%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.96%	9.70%	-0.74%

LNOIX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNOIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

LNOIX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

LNOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than PUDZX's 7.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LNOIX Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund	3.50%	3.65%	1.65%	1.80%	2.60%	1.76%	1.06%	1.91%	1.67%	1.94%	0.00%	0.00%
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	7.75%	8.93%	6.67%	3.66%	9.10%	13.00%	4.94%	3.40%	2.14%	2.10%	1.39%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNOIX and PUDZX in my portfolio?

LNOIX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LNOIX or PUDZX?

LNOIX has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to PUDZX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNOIX dropped -19.03% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.