LNCIX vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
LNCIX is managed by Ladenburg Thalmann. It was launched on Aug 23, 2015. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014.
Performance
LNCIX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LNCIX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNCIX Ladenburg Income Fund | -0.56% | 8.91% | 4.47% | 8.46% | -12.62% | 3.11% | 5.76% | 11.70% | -3.64% | 6.07% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.60% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNCIX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LNCIX has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 3.18%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.
LNCIX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 7.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 16.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LNCIX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNCIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LNCIX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
LNCIX
DGRO
LNCIX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LNCIX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.66 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.48 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 6.80 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LNCIX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.74 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.77 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.73 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between LNCIX and DGRO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LNCIX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
LNCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than DGRO's 2.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNCIX Ladenburg Income Fund | 3.49% | 3.45% | 2.17% | 2.29% | 2.02% | 6.02% | 1.22% | 2.25% | 1.80% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
LNCIX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNCIX drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNCIX and DGRO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNCIX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -35.10% | +18.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.09% | -10.92% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.72% | -19.31% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.72% | -35.10% | +18.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -4.70% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -3.48% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 2.37% | -1.27% |
Volatility
LNCIX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX) is 2.48%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that LNCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LNCIX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 3.57% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.59% | 7.21% | -3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.90% | 14.47% | -8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.79% | 13.84% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 16.63% | -9.98% |