LNGZX vs. CTCAX
LNGZX (Columbia Greater China Fund) and CTCAX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - LNGZX is a China Equities fund managed by Columbia, while CTCAX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, LNGZX returned 2.95%/yr vs 22.83%/yr for CTCAX. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LNGZX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for CTCAX.
Performance
LNGZX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNGZX achieves a -10.99% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 18.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LNGZX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 2.95%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.83% annualized return.
LNGZX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- -14.42%
- YTD
- -10.99%
- 1Y
- -2.31%
- 3Y*
- 1.74%
- 5Y*
- -8.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.28%
CTCAX
- 1D
- 5.75%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- 6M
- 16.09%
- YTD
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 32.88%
- 3Y*
- 27.89%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 22.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LNGZX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNGZX Columbia Greater China Fund | -10.99% | 27.49% | 12.29% | -18.70% | -28.42% | -25.21% | 46.04% | 32.95% | -20.01% | 59.90% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 18.39% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNGZX and CTCAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2002 | 0.58 |
The correlation between LNGZX and CTCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNGZX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
LNGZX
CTCAX
LNGZX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNGZX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.20 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 1.94 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 6.18 | -6.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNGZX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNGZX drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGZX and CTCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNGZX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -61.04% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.54% | -15.22% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.58% | -26.67% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.81% | -39.55% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.94% | -39.55% | -28.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.57% | -10.35% | -43.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.67% | -10.65% | -16.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.71% | 4.77% | +6.94% |
Volatility
LNGZX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX) is 6.62%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that LNGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNGZX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 10.69% | -4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 22.57% | -6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.84% | 26.35% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 26.92% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 25.27% | +1.34% |
LNGZX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNGZX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNGZX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
LNGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than CTCAX's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 2.78% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
LNGZX Columbia Greater China Fund | 2.11% | 1.88% | 1.21% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.29% | 1.40% | 5.85% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 4.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNGZX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTCAX has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to LNGZX (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNGZX dropped -73.37% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.
CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNGZX and CTCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer