PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX)
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Fund Info

ISIN
US19765L5122
Issuer
Columbia
Inception Date
May 15, 1997
Min. Investment
$2,000
Distribution Policy
Distributing
Asset Class
Equity
Asset Class Size
Large-Cap
Asset Class Style
Growth

Share Price Chart


Loading graphics...

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Columbia Greater China Fund

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Columbia Greater China Fund, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends.


Loading graphics...

S&P 500 Index

Returns By Period

Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX) has returned -9.04% so far this year and 2.39% over the past 12 months. Over the last ten years, LNGZX has returned 3.56% per year, falling short of the S&P 500 Index benchmark, which averaged 12.16% annually.


Columbia Greater China Fund

1D
-0.33%
1M
-8.52%
YTD
-9.04%
6M
-16.88%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
1.47%
5Y*
-11.17%
10Y*
3.56%

Benchmark (S&P 500 Index)

1D
2.91%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-4.63%
6M
-2.39%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 2, 1998, LNGZX's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.91%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 6.4 years.

Historically, 55% of months were positive and 45% were negative. The best month was Feb 1998 with a return of +35.0%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -22.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 13 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, LNGZX closed higher 51% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 16, 2022 with a return of +20.1%, while the worst single day was Oct 15, 2008 at -12.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.01%-4.40%-8.52%-9.04%
20252.39%9.01%1.48%-4.96%2.75%4.59%2.34%6.87%10.27%-4.30%-3.27%-1.29%27.49%
2024-10.71%6.37%2.06%5.53%3.38%-3.04%-3.26%-0.18%19.30%-3.46%-4.14%2.74%12.29%
202312.20%-11.67%2.26%-7.17%-10.07%4.97%10.78%-9.39%-4.44%-4.31%3.04%-3.20%-18.70%
2022-2.52%-6.69%-12.11%-4.40%0.91%8.39%-10.07%-0.14%-15.52%-19.25%33.73%4.52%-28.42%
20217.95%-1.16%-3.94%1.93%-0.88%0.79%-17.21%-1.25%-4.27%1.90%-6.55%-3.85%-25.21%

Benchmark Metrics

Columbia Greater China Fund has an annualized alpha of 4.47%, beta of 0.78, and R² of 0.30 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 05, 1998.

  • This fund participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (96.69%) than losses (94.47%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • R² of 0.30 means this fund moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
4.47%
Beta
0.78
0.30
Upside Capture
96.69%
Downside Capture
94.47%

Expense Ratio

LNGZX has a high expense ratio of 1.25%, indicating above-average management fees.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

LNGZX ranks 6 for risk / return — in the bottom 6% of mutual funds on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


LNGZX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
LNGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
LNGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below present risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX) and compare them to a chosen benchmark (S&P 500 Index).


LNGZXBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

0.90

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.27

1.39

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.21

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

1.40

-1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.01

6.61

-6.61

Explore LNGZX risk-adjusted metrics in detail

Dive deeper into individual metrics with historical trends, benchmark comparisons, and performance across different time periods.

Dividends

Dividend History

Columbia Greater China Fund provided a 2.07% dividend yield over the last twelve months, with an annual payout of $0.87 per share. The fund has been increasing its distributions for 2 consecutive years.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%$0.00$0.50$1.00$1.50$2.00$2.50$3.00$3.5020152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Dividends
Dividend Yield
PeriodTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Dividend$0.87$0.87$0.45$0.22$0.00$0.00$3.30$0.77$2.45$0.66$0.00$1.70

Dividend yield

2.07%1.88%1.21%0.67%0.00%0.00%4.29%1.40%5.85%1.20%0.00%4.54%

Monthly Dividends

The table displays the monthly dividend distributions for Columbia Greater China Fund. The dividends shown in the table have been adjusted to account for any splits that may have occurred.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.87$0.87
2024$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.45$0.45
2023$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.22$0.22
2022$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2021$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Columbia Greater China Fund. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Columbia Greater China Fund was 73.37%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 2201 trading sessions.

The current Columbia Greater China Fund drawdown is 52.56%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-73.37%Oct 18, 2007259Oct 27, 20082201Jul 26, 20172460
-67.94%Feb 18, 2021430Oct 31, 2022
-55.29%Mar 26, 1998110Aug 31, 1998203Jun 22, 1999313
-42.65%Mar 30, 2000370Sep 21, 2001574Jan 2, 2004944
-33.94%Jan 29, 2018191Oct 29, 2018399Jun 2, 2020590

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...