LNGX vs. MGNR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and MGNR (American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. LNGX is passively managed, while MGNR is actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MGNR.

Performance

LNGX vs. MGNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 21.25% return, which is significantly lower than MGNR's 25.87% return.

LNGX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -4.94%
• YTD: 21.25%
• 6M: 14.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MGNR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 25.87%
• 6M: 27.66%
• 1Y: 74.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. MGNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	21.25%	5.97%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	25.87%	8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and MGNR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

LNGX vs. MGNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGNR

MGNR Risk / Return Rank: 90
MGNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MGNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
MGNR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MGNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MGNR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNGX vs. MGNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNGX	MGNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.15	1.76	+0.39

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. MGNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum MGNR drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and MGNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNGX	MGNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-22.06%	+7.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.78%	-1.77%	-9.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-3.86%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LNGX	MGNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.60%	23.01%	+1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.60%	25.01%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.60%	25.01%	-0.41%

LNGX vs. MGNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MGNR's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LNGX vs. MGNR - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than MGNR's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.00%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	1.07%	1.17%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNGX and MGNR in my portfolio?

LNGX and MGNR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LNGX or MGNR?

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LNGX or MGNR?

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MGNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LNGX or MGNR?

MGNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.

What is the main difference between LNGX and MGNR?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.75% for MGNR.