MGNR vs. BTR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MGNR (American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF) and BTR (Beacon Tactical Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGNR is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by American Beacon, while BTR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Beacon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MGNR returned 54.46% vs 17.86% for BTR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGNR charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BTR.

Performance

MGNR vs. BTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGNR achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly higher than BTR's 7.96% return.

MGNR

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: -6.56%
• YTD: 13.14%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 54.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTR

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: 4.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGNR vs. BTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	13.14%	50.57%	22.90%
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	7.96%	-2.15%	15.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MGNR and BTR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2024	0.62

The correlation between MGNR and BTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MGNR vs. BTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGNR

MGNR Risk / Return Rank: 75
MGNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
MGNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
MGNR Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MGNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MGNR Martin Ratio Rank: 82

BTR

BTR Risk / Return Rank: 61
BTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BTR Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BTR Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGNR vs. BTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGNR	BTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.80	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	2.53	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.33	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	2.88	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.21	11.05	+4.16

MGNR vs. BTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGNR Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the BTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGNR and BTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGNR vs. BTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGNR drawdown since its inception was -22.06%, which is greater than BTR's maximum drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGNR and BTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGNR	BTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.06%	-16.67%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-6.23%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.71%	-1.33%	-10.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.95%	-5.51%	+1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	1.62%	+1.97%

Volatility

MGNR vs. BTR - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) at 2.92%. This indicates that MGNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGNR	BTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.30%	2.92%	+6.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.28%	7.35%	+11.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	9.98%	+14.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.32%	10.91%	+14.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.32%	10.91%	+14.41%

MGNR vs. BTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGNR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTR's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGNR vs. BTR - Dividend Comparison

MGNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, which matches BTR's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	1.19%	1.29%	0.87%	0.91%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	1.19%	1.17%	0.79%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGNR and BTR in my portfolio?

MGNR and BTR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGNR or BTR?

MGNR has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to BTR (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGNR dropped -22.06% vs BTR's -16.67%.

Which ETF is better, MGNR or BTR?

On 1-year performance, MGNR leads with 54.46% vs 17.86% for BTR. On fees, MGNR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MGNR or BTR?

Over the 1-year period, MGNR has performed better with a 54.46% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGNR or BTR?

MGNR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MGNR or BTR?

MGNR and BTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.19%.

What is the main difference between MGNR and BTR?

MGNR is categorized as Energy Equities, while BTR is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MGNR and 1.10% for BTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.