LNGX vs. INFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - LNGX tracks the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index while INFR tracks the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.

Performance

LNGX vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than INFR's 1.41% return.

LNGX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: 5.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	20.47%	5.97%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and INFR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

LNGX vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR

INFR Risk / Return Rank: 27
INFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
INFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
INFR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
INFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
INFR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNGX vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNGX	INFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.10	0.46	+1.64

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum INFR drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and INFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNGX	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-19.28%	+4.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.43%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.36%	-0.70%	-10.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-4.93%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LNGX	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.67%	9.00%	+15.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.67%	14.26%	+10.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.67%	14.26%	+10.41%

LNGX vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

LNGX vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than INFR's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	2.49%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNGX and INFR in my portfolio?

LNGX and INFR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LNGX or INFR?

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LNGX or INFR?

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LNGX or INFR?

INFR has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.

What is the main difference between LNGX and INFR?

LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.59% for INFR.