LNGX vs. IEZ
LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and IEZ (iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - LNGX tracks the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index while IEZ tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IEZ.
Performance
LNGX vs. IEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly lower than IEZ's 30.48% return.
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 17.84%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEZ
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- YTD
- 30.48%
- 1Y
- 60.54%
- 3Y*
- 7.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.82%
- 10Y*
- -1.92%
LNGX vs. IEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 16.45% | 5.29% |
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 30.48% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNGX and IEZ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNGX vs. IEZ — Risk / Return Rank
LNGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IEZ
LNGX vs. IEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNGX | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNGX vs. IEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum IEZ drawdown of -92.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and IEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNGX | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -92.52% | +74.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.31% | -56.94% | +42.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -48.29% | +42.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.98% | — |
Volatility
LNGX vs. IEZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNGX | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.83% | 29.07% | -4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 36.09% | -11.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 41.44% | -16.61% |
LNGX vs. IEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IEZ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNGX vs. IEZ - Dividend Comparison
LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than IEZ's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 1.27% | 1.87% | 1.76% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 1.20% | 2.07% | 2.28% | 1.81% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 2.40% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNGX and IEZ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
IEZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.85% for LNGX.
LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while IEZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.42% for IEZ.
Find the right allocation for LNGX and IEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer