LNGX vs. HFSI
LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and HFSI (Hartford Strategic Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while HFSI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Hartford. LNGX is passively managed, while HFSI is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HFSI.
Performance
LNGX vs. HFSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than HFSI's 1.45% return.
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFSI
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LNGX vs. HFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 14.75% | 5.29% |
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 1.45% | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNGX and HFSI is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNGX vs. HFSI — Risk / Return Rank
LNGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HFSI
LNGX vs. HFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNGX | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNGX vs. HFSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum HFSI drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and HFSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNGX | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -19.34% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.56% | -0.37% | -15.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -5.66% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.76% | — |
Volatility
LNGX vs. HFSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNGX | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.89% | 3.57% | +21.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 4.96% | +19.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 4.96% | +19.93% |
LNGX vs. HFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSI's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNGX vs. HFSI - Dividend Comparison
LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than HFSI's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 5.54% | 5.67% | 6.51% | 5.77% | 4.87% | 0.71% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNGX and HFSI have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HFSI.
HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.23% for LNGX.
LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while HFSI is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.49% for HFSI.
Find the right allocation for LNGX and HFSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer