LNG vs. EMEQ
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) is a stock, while EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Nomura. Over the past year, LNG returned 12.83% vs 107.90% for EMEQ. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
LNG vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 36.26% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 53.76% return.
LNG
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 8.06%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- YTD
- 36.26%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 26.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.85%
EMEQ
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- 6M
- 30.45%
- YTD
- 53.76%
- 1Y
- 107.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 65.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.75M | $9.16M | $11.52M | |
| $449.81M | $470.16M | $533.59M |
LNG vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 36.26% | -8.70% | 18.95% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 53.76% | 69.78% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and EMEQ is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | -0.05 |
The correlation between LNG and EMEQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
EMEQ
LNG vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.43 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 4.13 | -3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 15.08 | -14.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -26.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and EMEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -26.25% | -71.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -26.25% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.02% | -20.86% | +9.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -4.67% | -38.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.86% | 7.18% | +5.68% |
Volatility
LNG vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 9.48%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 14.87% | -5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.32% | 37.54% | -14.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.45% | 40.39% | -13.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.42% | 34.15% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.28% | 34.15% | -1.87% |
Dividends
LNG vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than EMEQ's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.79% | 2.76% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.82% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and EMEQ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMEQ has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to LNG (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs EMEQ's -26.25%.
EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNG and EMEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer