PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMT vs. VWELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMT vs. VWELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VWELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly higher than VWELX's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has outperformed VWELX with an annualized return of 10.91%, while VWELX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.


LMT

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.35%
YTD
8.80%
6M
13.08%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.91%

VWELX

1D
-2.02%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
4.55%
6M
4.96%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMT vs. VWELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
8.80%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%
VWELX
Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares
4.55%16.54%14.73%14.29%-14.36%18.99%10.57%22.51%-3.43%13.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and VWELX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1980

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between LMT and VWELX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMT vs. VWELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VWELX
VWELX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VWELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VWELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWELX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMT vs. VWELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VWELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMTVWELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.39

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

2.67

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

12.31

-11.27

LMT vs. VWELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the VWELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and VWELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMTVWELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

2.09

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.75

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.86

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.84

-0.46

Drawdowns

LMT vs. VWELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than VWELX's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and VWELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMTVWELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.29%

-36.12%

-43.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

-6.78%

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.79%

-11.98%

-19.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

-20.88%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

-25.33%

-11.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.64%

-2.39%

-20.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.84%

-3.92%

-22.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.51%

1.47%

+9.04%

Volatility

LMT vs. VWELX - Volatility Comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VWELX) at 3.12%. This indicates that LMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMTVWELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

3.12%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.60%

7.00%

+12.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.62%

8.67%

+17.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

11.17%

+11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.72%

11.55%

+12.17%

Dividends

LMT vs. VWELX - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than VWELX's 11.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.62%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
VWELX
Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares
11.02%11.46%10.76%6.01%8.19%8.64%7.77%4.67%9.49%5.82%4.44%7.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMT and VWELX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMT has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to VWELX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs VWELX's -36.12%.

VWELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMT and VWELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer