LMT vs. SBUX
LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) and SBUX (Starbucks Corporation) are both stocks. LMT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while SBUX operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, LMT returned 11.37%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for SBUX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMT vs. SBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than SBUX's 23.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has outperformed SBUX with an annualized return of 11.37%, while SBUX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.66% annualized return.
LMT
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
SBUX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 23.87%
- 6M
- 22.22%
- 1Y
- 13.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
LMT vs. SBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 13.04% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 23.87% | -5.26% | -2.48% | -1.19% | -13.18% | 11.15% | 24.19% | 39.09% | 14.74% | 5.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMT and SBUX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 1992 | 0.23 |
The correlation between LMT and SBUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LMT:
$124.87B
SBUX:
$117.80B
LMT:
$20.61
SBUX:
$1.31
LMT:
26.21
SBUX:
78.64
LMT:
1.67
SBUX:
3.06
LMT:
$75.12B
SBUX:
$38.46B
LMT:
$7.37B
SBUX:
$12.24B
LMT:
$8.09B
SBUX:
$5.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMT vs. SBUX — Risk / Return Rank
LMT
SBUX
LMT vs. SBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMT | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.09 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.66 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | 1.45 | +0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMT vs. SBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, roughly equal to the maximum SBUX drawdown of -81.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and SBUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMT | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.29% | -81.91% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.15% | -18.53% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.79% | -31.97% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.79% | -43.68% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | -43.68% | +7.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.63% | -8.15% | -11.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.83% | -16.24% | -10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 8.37% | +2.44% |
Volatility
LMT vs. SBUX - Volatility Comparison
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) have volatilities of 7.02% and 7.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMT | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 7.26% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.04% | 21.10% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.71% | 28.48% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 31.68% | -8.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 29.47% | -5.71% |
Dividends
LMT vs. SBUX - Dividend Comparison
LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than SBUX's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.53% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2.40% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.25% | 2.02% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.83% | 1.53% | 1.13% |
Financials
LMT vs. SBUX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Starbucks Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LMT vs. SBUX - Profitability Comparison
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
SBUX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.32B and revenue of 9.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.3%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
SBUX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported an operating income of 828.10M and revenue of 9.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
SBUX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a net income of 510.90M and revenue of 9.53B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMT and SBUX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBUX has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to LMT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs SBUX's -81.91%.
LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMT and SBUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer