PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMT vs. MIH.F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMT vs. MIH.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LMT is traded in USD, while MIH.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MIH.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than MIH.F's -6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has underperformed MIH.F with an annualized return of 11.37%, while MIH.F has yielded a comparatively higher 19.54% annualized return.


LMT

1D
-1.52%
1M
5.40%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.84%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
11.37%

MIH.F

1D
4.98%
1M
-11.99%
YTD
-6.65%
6M
-10.38%
1Y
-4.09%
3Y*
74.03%
5Y*
47.82%
10Y*
19.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMT vs. MIH.F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
13.04%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%
MIH.F
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
-6.65%73.47%145.38%49.22%72.03%-24.35%-22.39%10.19%-4.33%-17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and MIH.F is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2007

0.05

The correlation between LMT and MIH.F shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMT vs. MIH.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MIH.F
MIH.F Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MIH.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIH.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIH.F Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MIH.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIH.F Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMT vs. MIH.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMTMIH.FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.03

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

-0.07

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

-0.20

+1.89

LMT vs. MIH.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the MIH.F Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and MIH.F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMT vs. MIH.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than MIH.F's maximum drawdown of -72.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and MIH.F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMTMIH.FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.29%

-72.08%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

-34.10%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.79%

-34.10%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

-34.10%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

-58.70%

+22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.63%

-30.09%

+10.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.83%

-38.31%

+11.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

11.72%

-0.91%

Volatility

LMT vs. MIH.F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is 7.02%, while Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MIH.F) has a volatility of 15.78%. This indicates that LMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIH.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMTMIH.FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

15.78%

-8.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

35.24%

-15.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.71%

46.10%

-19.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.99%

45.00%

-22.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.76%

39.32%

-15.56%

Dividends

LMT vs. MIH.F - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while MIH.F has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.53%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
MIH.F
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.03%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.01%

Financials

LMT vs. MIH.F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LMT values in USD, MIH.F values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


LMT and MIH.F have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMT and MIH.F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer