PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMSIX vs. HFCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMSIX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSIX achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than HFCGX's 12.44% return. Over the past 10 years, LMSIX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 11.14%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.


LMSIX

1D
1.15%
1M
-0.16%
6M
14.39%
YTD
19.73%
1Y
40.26%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
8.13%

HFCGX

1D
3.16%
1M
2.88%
6M
7.39%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LMSIX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMSIX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
19.73%20.19%9.90%18.80%-15.16%29.12%11.29%20.75%-15.61%8.81%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
12.44%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-21.39%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSIX and HFCGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2000

0.90

The correlation between LMSIX and HFCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMSIX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMSIX
LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMSIX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMSIXHFCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

2.39

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

6.64

+7.43

LMSIX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSIX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMSIX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.16%, roughly equal to the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSIX and HFCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMSIXHFCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.16%

-62.35%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-7.82%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-22.86%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.66%

-26.30%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.26%

-54.22%

+3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-4.09%

+2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-15.17%

+4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.81%

-0.15%

Volatility

LMSIX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) is 3.88%, while Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that LMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMSIXHFCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

6.56%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

11.96%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

14.57%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

23.87%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.45%

25.88%

-2.43%

LMSIX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMSIX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

LMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%
LMSIX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
6.73%6.35%4.05%3.70%5.18%21.64%3.60%1.48%11.17%8.85%4.79%7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMSIX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCGX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to LMSIX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSIX dropped -61.16% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMSIX and HFCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer