HFCGX vs. STLG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HFCGX (Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund) and STLG (iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF) are both funds - HFCGX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Hennessy, while STLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index. Over the past 5 years, HFCGX returned 12.52%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for STLG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFCGX charges 1.34%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for STLG.

Performance

HFCGX vs. STLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCGX achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly lower than STLG's 22.17% return.

HFCGX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 14.84%
• 6M: 16.17%
• 1Y: 21.13%
• 3Y*: 24.56%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 12.75%

STLG

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 12.94%
• YTD: 22.17%
• 6M: 23.18%
• 1Y: 46.14%
• 3Y*: 33.92%
• 5Y*: 20.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCGX vs. STLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	14.84%	4.78%	31.45%	19.58%	-4.97%	29.94%	15.57%
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	22.17%	21.49%	37.42%	42.86%	-26.75%	27.99%	26.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCGX and STLG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020	0.61

The correlation between HFCGX and STLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HFCGX vs. STLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCGX

HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 41
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

STLG

STLG Risk / Return Rank: 72
STLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
STLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
STLG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
STLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
STLG Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCGX vs. STLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HFCGX	STLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.59	-0.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	3.33	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.43	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	3.41	-0.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.63	13.74	-4.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HFCGX vs. STLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the STLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCGX and STLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HFCGX	STLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.59	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.95	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.90	-0.51

Drawdowns

HFCGX vs. STLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCGX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, which is greater than STLG's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCGX and STLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFCGX	STLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.35%	-31.34%	-31.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.82%	-13.69%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.86%	-23.73%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.30%	-30.61%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.01%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.23%	-7.37%	-7.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	3.40%	-1.03%

Volatility

HFCGX vs. STLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) is 4.38%, while iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that HFCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFCGX	STLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	4.87%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	13.88%	-4.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	17.87%	-4.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.07%	21.97%	+2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.81%	23.90%	+1.91%

HFCGX vs. STLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than STLG's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFCGX vs. STLG - Dividend Comparison

HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	14.11%	0.38%	3.58%	26.58%	0.00%	0.00%	10.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.11%
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	0.25%	0.31%	0.38%	0.75%	1.85%	0.67%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFCGX and STLG in my portfolio?

HFCGX and STLG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFCGX or STLG?

STLG has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to HFCGX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCGX dropped -62.35% vs STLG's -31.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.