LMSIX vs. FRDPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LMSIX (Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund) and FRDPX (Franklin Rising Dividends Fund) are both mutual funds - LMSIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FRDPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, LMSIX returned 11.99%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for FRDPX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LMSIX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FRDPX.

Performance

LMSIX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSIX achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's 5.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LMSIX having a 11.99% annualized return and FRDPX not far behind at 11.53%.

LMSIX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: 19.79%
• 6M: 17.39%
• 1Y: 43.89%
• 3Y*: 22.75%
• 5Y*: 10.31%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

FRDPX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 6M: 4.44%
• 1Y: 13.66%
• 3Y*: 11.46%
• 5Y*: 8.39%
• 10Y*: 11.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMSIX vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	19.79%	20.19%	9.90%	18.80%	-15.16%	29.12%	11.29%	20.75%	-15.61%	8.81%
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund	5.20%	11.96%	10.92%	12.10%	-10.69%	26.62%	16.29%	29.83%	-5.27%	17.33%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSIX and FRDPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2000	0.83

The correlation between LMSIX and FRDPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LMSIX vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMSIX

LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 81
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FRDPX

FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMSIX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMSIX	FRDPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	1.45	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	2.11	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.25	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.96	2.09	+2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.16	8.15	+9.00

LMSIX vs. FRDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the FRDPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSIX and FRDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMSIX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.16%, which is greater than FRDPX's maximum drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSIX and FRDPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMSIX	FRDPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.16%	-51.57%	-9.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-7.10%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.80%	-18.26%	-8.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.66%	-21.07%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.26%	-34.89%	-15.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.92%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.86%	-5.81%	-5.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	1.82%	+0.84%

Volatility

LMSIX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) at 2.79%. This indicates that LMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMSIX	FRDPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	2.79%	+2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.51%	7.83%	+5.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	10.28%	+8.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.00%	15.36%	+6.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.54%	17.19%	+6.35%

LMSIX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMSIX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison

LMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, less than FRDPX's 9.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund	9.72%	10.25%	10.15%	4.60%	4.96%	4.42%	0.82%	3.01%	5.20%	0.90%	3.09%	5.30%
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	6.73%	6.35%	4.05%	3.70%	5.18%	21.64%	3.60%	1.48%	11.17%	8.85%	4.79%	7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMSIX and FRDPX in my portfolio?

LMSIX and FRDPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMSIX or FRDPX?

LMSIX has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to FRDPX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSIX dropped -61.16% vs FRDPX's -51.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.