PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMSIX vs. CRSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMSIX vs. CRSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund (CRSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LMSIX having a 19.79% return and CRSSX slightly lower at 19.68%.


LMSIX

1D
0.93%
1M
5.97%
YTD
19.79%
6M
17.39%
1Y
43.89%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
11.99%

CRSSX

1D
0.00%
1M
4.35%
YTD
19.68%
6M
17.66%
1Y
34.76%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMSIX vs. CRSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LMSIX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
19.79%20.19%9.90%18.80%-6.01%
CRSSX
Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund
19.68%5.86%8.16%16.02%-6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSIX and CRSSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.96

The correlation between LMSIX and CRSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMSIX vs. CRSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMSIX
LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSSX
CRSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CRSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMSIX vs. CRSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund (CRSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMSIXCRSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

4.29

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.16

14.29

+2.87

LMSIX vs. CRSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the CRSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSIX and CRSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMSIX vs. CRSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.16%, which is greater than CRSSX's maximum drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSIX and CRSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMSIXCRSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.16%

-27.86%

-33.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-8.60%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-27.86%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-7.71%

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.57%

+0.09%

Volatility

LMSIX vs. CRSSX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund (CRSSX) at 4.85%. This indicates that LMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMSIXCRSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

4.85%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.51%

12.04%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.87%

17.84%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

21.77%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

21.77%

+1.77%

LMSIX vs. CRSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSSX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMSIX vs. CRSSX - Dividend Comparison

LMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than CRSSX's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRSSX
Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund
4.77%5.64%2.30%1.36%5.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMSIX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
6.73%6.35%4.05%3.70%5.18%21.64%3.60%1.48%11.17%8.85%4.79%7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, LMSIX and CRSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LMSIX has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to CRSSX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSIX dropped -61.16% vs CRSSX's -27.86%.

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMSIX and CRSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer