CRSSX vs. CMMVX
CRSSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund) and CMMVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund) are both mutual funds - CRSSX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds, while CMMVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds. Over the past 3 years, CRSSX returned 14.22%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for CMMVX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRSSX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMMVX.
Performance
CRSSX vs. CMMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSSX achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than CMMVX's 7.46% return.
CRSSX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 33.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMMVX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSSX vs. CMMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSSX Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund | 15.29% | 5.86% | 8.16% | 16.02% | -6.44% |
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund | 7.46% | 13.09% | 12.44% | 16.24% | -9.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSSX and CMMVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CRSSX and CMMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSSX vs. CMMVX — Risk / Return Rank
CRSSX
CMMVX
CRSSX vs. CMMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund (CRSSX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRSSX | CMMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.29 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 3.30 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 2.88 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 12.73 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRSSX | CMMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.29 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.70 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
CRSSX vs. CMMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSSX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, which is greater than CMMVX's maximum drawdown of -20.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSSX and CMMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSSX | CMMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -20.58% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.60% | -6.31% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.86% | -11.51% | -16.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | 0.00% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -5.47% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 1.43% | +1.16% |
Volatility
CRSSX vs. CMMVX - Volatility Comparison
Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund (CRSSX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) at 2.38%. This indicates that CRSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSSX | CMMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 2.38% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 6.27% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.60% | 8.02% | +9.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 10.69% | +11.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 10.69% | +11.11% |
CRSSX vs. CMMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSSX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CMMVX's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRSSX vs. CMMVX - Dividend Comparison
CRSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than CMMVX's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund | 3.43% | 3.68% | 3.00% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.08% |
CRSSX Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund | 4.95% | 5.64% | 2.30% | 1.36% | 5.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSSX and CMMVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSSX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to CMMVX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSSX dropped -27.86% vs CMMVX's -20.58%.
CMMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSSX and CMMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer