LMOPX vs. FZAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LMOPX (Miller Opportunity Trust) and FZAMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LMOPX returned 12.58%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for FZAMX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LMOPX charges 1.95%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FZAMX.

Performance

LMOPX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMOPX achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 21.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LMOPX having a 12.58% annualized return and FZAMX not far behind at 12.38%.

LMOPX

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 5.67%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 39.88%
• 3Y*: 25.89%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

FZAMX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 22.92%
• 1Y: 38.64%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMOPX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMOPX Miller Opportunity Trust	5.67%	26.41%	25.40%	38.10%	-36.67%	-3.97%	37.56%	32.94%	-10.47%	25.00%
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	21.57%	12.00%	17.39%	15.15%	-14.70%	25.40%	18.84%	23.85%	-14.85%	20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LMOPX and FZAMX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013	0.85

The correlation between LMOPX and FZAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMOPX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMOPX

LMOPX Risk / Return Rank: 43
LMOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LMOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LMOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LMOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
LMOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FZAMX

FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMOPX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMOPX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.35	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.19	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.41	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	4.12	-1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.24	16.56	-7.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMOPX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMOPX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMOPX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.35	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.56	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.59	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.57	-0.31

Drawdowns

LMOPX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMOPX drawdown since its inception was -81.54%, which is greater than FZAMX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMOPX and FZAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMOPX	FZAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.54%	-42.32%	-39.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.96%	-9.77%	-6.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.19%	-25.24%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.85%	-25.24%	-27.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.03%	-42.32%	-10.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	0.00%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.17%	-6.08%	-15.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	2.43%	+2.08%

Volatility

LMOPX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) have volatilities of 4.96% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMOPX	FZAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.96%	5.00%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.86%	13.74%	+1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.02%	17.14%	+3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.12%	20.23%	+7.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.86%	20.94%	+7.92%

LMOPX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMOPX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMOPX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

LMOPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FZAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	5.80%	10.09%	6.93%	2.83%	5.86%	18.58%	1.41%	3.50%	10.72%	7.81%	5.00%	4.90%
LMOPX Miller Opportunity Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.45%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMOPX and FZAMX in my portfolio?

LMOPX and FZAMX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMOPX or FZAMX?

FZAMX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to LMOPX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMOPX dropped -81.54% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.