LMIYX vs. NEAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX).
LMIYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jul 9, 1999. NEAGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001.
Performance
LMIYX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LMIYX vs. NEAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMIYX Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund | 0.25% | 11.02% | 27.28% | 6.14% | -29.10% | 32.54% | 79.45% | 34.34% | 2.19% | 38.54% |
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 11.92% | 26.40% | 14.31% | 37.65% | -27.53% | 37.56% | 51.53% | 43.82% | -16.09% | 8.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMIYX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than NEAGX's 11.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LMIYX having a 18.91% annualized return and NEAGX not far behind at 18.04%.
LMIYX
- 1D
- 5.66%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 35.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.48%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.91%
NEAGX
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 60.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LMIYX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMIYX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LMIYX vs. NEAGX — Risk / Return Rank
LMIYX
NEAGX
LMIYX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMIYX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 2.14 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.71 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 4.27 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | 15.19 | -5.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMIYX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.14 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.62 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.59 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between LMIYX and NEAGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LMIYX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison
LMIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NEAGX's 1.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMIYX Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 22.32% | 23.16% | 15.30% | 37.13% | 15.17% | 0.00% | 21.83% |
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 1.91% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.10% | 3.91% | 10.64% | 16.57% | 5.17% | 6.72% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
LMIYX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMIYX drawdown since its inception was -61.35%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMIYX and NEAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMIYX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.35% | -41.80% | -19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -14.01% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.86% | -36.31% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.37% | -36.31% | -7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -7.75% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -8.72% | -9.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 3.93% | -0.25% |
Volatility
LMIYX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) have volatilities of 11.24% and 11.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LMIYX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 11.64% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.63% | 19.84% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.03% | 28.93% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 24.33% | +5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.87% | 23.90% | +4.97% |