PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMGTX vs. LMLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMGTX vs. LMLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGTX achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly higher than LMLCX's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGTX has outperformed LMLCX with an annualized return of 9.03%, while LMLCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.65% annualized return.


LMGTX

1D
0.64%
1M
5.26%
YTD
6.00%
6M
6.38%
1Y
12.56%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
9.03%

LMLCX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.85%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.66%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMGTX vs. LMLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMGTX
ClearBridge International Growth Fund
6.00%21.83%6.39%13.17%-21.97%2.93%23.55%30.01%-10.28%35.09%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
1.82%12.22%-2.21%12.93%-3.51%3.08%2.93%15.10%-4.24%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGTX and LMLCX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2012

0.38

The correlation between LMGTX and LMLCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMGTX vs. LMLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMGTX
LMGTX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
LMGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

LMLCX
LMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMGTX vs. LMLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMGTXLMLCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

1.68

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

2.52

-1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.31

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

2.75

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.12

9.40

-6.28

LMGTX vs. LMLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the LMLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGTX and LMLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMGTXLMLCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.68

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.59

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.65

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.78

-0.44

Drawdowns

LMGTX vs. LMLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.47%, which is greater than LMLCX's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGTX and LMLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMGTXLMLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.47%

-23.45%

-48.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-4.22%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-11.77%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.65%

-11.77%

-23.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

-23.45%

-12.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

0.00%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.49%

-1.94%

-14.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

1.23%

+2.56%

Volatility

LMGTX vs. LMLCX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) at 2.07%. This indicates that LMGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMGTXLMLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

2.07%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

4.47%

+10.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

6.91%

+10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

7.79%

+9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

7.19%

+10.17%

LMGTX vs. LMLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGTX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LMLCX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMGTX vs. LMLCX - Dividend Comparison

LMGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than LMLCX's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMGTX
ClearBridge International Growth Fund
7.37%7.81%0.54%0.48%0.07%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
6.18%6.11%6.58%5.78%4.46%5.42%3.54%4.16%5.59%4.04%3.75%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMGTX and LMLCX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGTX has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to LMLCX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGTX dropped -71.47% vs LMLCX's -23.45%.

LMLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMGTX and LMLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer