LMLCX vs. ARMGX
LMLCX (Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund) and ARMGX (Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund) are both mutual funds - LMLCX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Legg Mason, while ARMGX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMLCX returned 4.66%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for ARMGX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMLCX charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for ARMGX.
Performance
LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMLCX achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than ARMGX's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LMLCX has outperformed ARMGX with an annualized return of 4.66%, while ARMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.
LMLCX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 10.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
ARMGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMLCX Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund | 2.13% | 12.22% | -2.21% | 12.93% | -3.51% | 3.08% | 2.93% | 15.10% | -4.24% | 7.20% |
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund | 1.07% | 4.20% | 4.67% | 5.25% | -1.91% | 0.06% | 0.80% | 3.38% | 0.91% | 3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMLCX and ARMGX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between LMLCX and ARMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMLCX vs. ARMGX — Risk / Return Rank
LMLCX
ARMGX
LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) and Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMLCX | ARMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 2.48 | -1.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 11.07 | -8.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 49.49 | -41.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMLCX drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than ARMGX's maximum drawdown of -21.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMLCX and ARMGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMLCX | ARMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -21.79% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.22% | -0.33% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.77% | -0.55% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.77% | -3.23% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.45% | -9.09% | -14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -1.53% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 0.07% | +1.16% |
Volatility
LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) at 0.39%. This indicates that LMLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMLCX | ARMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.88% | 0.39% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.63% | 0.88% | +3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.72% | 1.19% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 1.26% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.20% | 1.62% | +5.58% |
LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMLCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMGX's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Dividend Comparison
LMLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than ARMGX's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.37% | 0.17% | 1.45% | 2.32% | 1.92% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 0.48% |
LMLCX Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund | 6.18% | 6.11% | 6.58% | 5.78% | 4.46% | 5.42% | 3.54% | 4.16% | 5.59% | 4.04% | 3.75% | 5.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMLCX and ARMGX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMLCX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to ARMGX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMLCX dropped -23.45% vs ARMGX's -21.79%.
ARMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMLCX and ARMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer