PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMLCX vs. ARMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) and Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMLCX achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than ARMGX's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LMLCX has outperformed ARMGX with an annualized return of 4.66%, while ARMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


LMLCX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.77%
YTD
2.13%
6M
2.36%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
4.66%

ARMGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.35%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
2.13%12.22%-2.21%12.93%-3.51%3.08%2.93%15.10%-4.24%7.20%
ARMGX
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund
1.07%4.20%4.67%5.25%-1.91%0.06%0.80%3.38%0.91%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LMLCX and ARMGX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2012

0.26

The correlation between LMLCX and ARMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMLCX vs. ARMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMLCX
LMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMGX
ARMGX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ARMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) and Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMLCXARMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

2.48

-1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

11.07

-8.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

49.49

-41.12

LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the ARMGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMLCX and ARMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMLCX drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than ARMGX's maximum drawdown of -21.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMLCX and ARMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMLCXARMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-21.79%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-0.33%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.77%

-0.55%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.77%

-3.23%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.45%

-9.09%

-14.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-1.53%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.07%

+1.16%

Volatility

LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) at 0.39%. This indicates that LMLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMLCXARMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

0.39%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

0.88%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.72%

1.19%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.82%

1.26%

+6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.20%

1.62%

+5.58%

LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMLCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMGX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMLCX vs. ARMGX - Dividend Comparison

LMLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than ARMGX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARMGX
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund
2.87%3.00%2.43%2.23%1.37%0.17%1.45%2.32%1.92%1.37%0.96%0.48%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
6.18%6.11%6.58%5.78%4.46%5.42%3.54%4.16%5.59%4.04%3.75%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMLCX and ARMGX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMLCX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to ARMGX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMLCX dropped -23.45% vs ARMGX's -21.79%.

ARMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMLCX and ARMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer