LMLCX vs. LCSSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LMLCX (Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund) and LCSSX (ClearBridge Select Fund) are both mutual funds - LMLCX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Legg Mason, while LCSSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMLCX returned 4.66%/yr vs 16.95%/yr for LCSSX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMLCX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LCSSX.

Performance

LMLCX vs. LCSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) and ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMLCX achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than LCSSX's 3.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LMLCX has underperformed LCSSX with an annualized return of 4.66%, while LCSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.

LMLCX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: 10.00%
• 3Y*: 6.32%
• 5Y*: 4.48%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

LCSSX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 3.46%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 13.34%
• 3Y*: 13.44%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 16.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMLCX vs. LCSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMLCX Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund	2.13%	12.22%	-2.21%	12.93%	-3.51%	3.08%	2.93%	15.10%	-4.24%	7.20%
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund	3.46%	7.26%	21.54%	24.25%	-33.06%	20.27%	58.86%	33.60%	10.56%	39.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LMLCX and LCSSX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012	0.33

The correlation between LMLCX and LCSSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMLCX vs. LCSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMLCX

LMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 37
LMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
LMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
LMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

LCSSX

LCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
LCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
LCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
LCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
LCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMLCX vs. LCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) and ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMLCX	LCSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	0.87	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	1.27	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.15	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	0.93	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	2.85	+5.53

LMLCX vs. LCSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the LCSSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMLCX and LCSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMLCX vs. LCSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMLCX drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum LCSSX drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMLCX and LCSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMLCX	LCSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-43.46%	+20.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.22%	-14.24%	+10.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.77%	-23.67%	+11.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.77%	-43.46%	+31.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.45%	-43.46%	+20.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.11%	+2.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-9.17%	+7.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	4.63%	-3.40%

Volatility

LMLCX vs. LCSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) is 1.88%, while ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that LMLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMLCX	LCSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	5.13%	-3.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.63%	11.95%	-7.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.72%	15.14%	-8.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.82%	21.82%	-14.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.20%	21.94%	-14.74%

LMLCX vs. LCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMLCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LCSSX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMLCX vs. LCSSX - Dividend Comparison

LMLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, while LCSSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	3.26%	0.00%	0.00%	1.28%	2.11%	1.12%	5.25%
LMLCX Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund	6.18%	6.11%	6.58%	5.78%	4.46%	5.42%	3.54%	4.16%	5.59%	4.04%	3.75%	5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMLCX and LCSSX in my portfolio?

LMLCX and LCSSX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMLCX or LCSSX?

LCSSX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to LMLCX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMLCX dropped -23.45% vs LCSSX's -43.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.