LMCLX vs. ABIEX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LMCLX (Miller Income Fund) and ABIEX (AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, LMCLX returned 9.24%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for ABIEX. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LMCLX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ABIEX.

Performance

LMCLX vs. ABIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Income Fund (LMCLX) and AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMCLX achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly lower than ABIEX's 15.45% return. Over the past 10 years, LMCLX has outperformed ABIEX with an annualized return of 9.24%, while ABIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.

LMCLX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 6.68%
• 6M: 9.34%
• YTD: 12.11%
• 1Y: 19.50%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: 9.24%
• ALL TIME*: 6.75%

ABIEX

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -2.52%
• 6M: 7.03%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 1Y: 29.63%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 7.26%
• ALL TIME*: 5.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABIEX AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LMCLX Miller Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LMCLX vs. ABIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMCLX Miller Income Fund	12.11%	8.40%	27.96%	13.95%	-22.77%	29.14%	-2.83%	26.02%	-8.00%	16.98%
ABIEX AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio	15.45%	24.71%	14.27%	16.88%	-22.59%	-1.08%	13.83%	18.39%	-13.90%	20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LMCLX and ABIEX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2014	0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between LMCLX and ABIEX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LMCLX vs. ABIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMCLX

LMCLX Risk / Return Rank: 45
LMCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LMCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
LMCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LMCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LMCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

ABIEX

ABIEX Risk / Return Rank: 62
ABIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ABIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ABIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ABIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ABIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMCLX vs. ABIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Income Fund (LMCLX) and AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMCLX	ABIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.51	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.99	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	2.49	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.83	8.06	-2.24

LMCLX vs. ABIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMCLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the ABIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMCLX and ABIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMCLX vs. ABIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMCLX drawdown since its inception was -44.81%, which is greater than ABIEX's maximum drawdown of -38.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMCLX and ABIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMCLX	ABIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.81%	-38.56%	-6.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.69%	-11.19%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	-11.99%	-10.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.67%	-36.34%	+1.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.81%	-38.56%	-6.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.00%	+8.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.37%	-9.99%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	3.44%	-0.34%

Volatility

LMCLX vs. ABIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Miller Income Fund (LMCLX) is 3.09%, while AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that LMCLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMCLX	ABIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	7.76%	-4.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.93%	17.02%	-8.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	18.45%	-5.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.72%	13.95%	+3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.56%	13.74%	+3.82%

LMCLX vs. ABIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMCLX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than ABIEX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMCLX vs. ABIEX - Dividend Comparison

LMCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than ABIEX's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABIEX AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio	2.79%	3.50%	5.39%	6.16%	3.85%	3.63%	2.35%	5.31%	6.00%	3.80%	4.63%	4.11%
LMCLX Miller Income Fund	2.92%	3.59%	4.28%	5.81%	6.33%	5.52%	6.04%	8.23%	9.22%	7.97%	8.54%	8.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMCLX and ABIEX in my portfolio?

LMCLX and ABIEX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMCLX or ABIEX?

ABIEX has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to LMCLX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMCLX dropped -44.81% vs ABIEX's -38.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.