PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMCLX vs. BERIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMCLX vs. BERIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Income Fund (LMCLX) and Chartwell Income Fund (BERIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMCLX achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than BERIX's 4.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LMCLX has outperformed BERIX with an annualized return of 9.45%, while BERIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.96% annualized return.


LMCLX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
6.84%
6M
10.94%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
9.45%

BERIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
4.70%
6M
5.63%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
4.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMCLX vs. BERIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMCLX
Miller Income Fund
6.84%8.40%27.96%13.95%-22.77%29.14%-2.83%26.02%-8.00%16.98%
BERIX
Chartwell Income Fund
4.70%13.23%7.20%7.77%-10.14%7.35%4.49%9.69%-0.81%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LMCLX and BERIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between LMCLX and BERIX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMCLX vs. BERIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMCLX
LMCLX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LMCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LMCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BERIX
BERIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BERIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BERIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMCLX vs. BERIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Income Fund (LMCLX) and Chartwell Income Fund (BERIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMCLXBERIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

2.91

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

3.79

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.60

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

5.64

-3.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.69

20.27

-13.58

LMCLX vs. BERIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMCLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the BERIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMCLX and BERIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMCLXBERIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.91

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.78

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.83

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.07

-0.68

Drawdowns

LMCLX vs. BERIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMCLX drawdown since its inception was -44.81%, which is greater than BERIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMCLX and BERIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMCLXBERIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.81%

-20.34%

-24.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-2.51%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

-5.82%

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.67%

-15.73%

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.81%

-20.34%

-24.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-1.15%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-2.59%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

0.70%

+2.26%

Volatility

LMCLX vs. BERIX - Volatility Comparison

Miller Income Fund (LMCLX) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Chartwell Income Fund (BERIX) at 1.33%. This indicates that LMCLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BERIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMCLXBERIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.33%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

4.23%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

4.89%

+8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

5.94%

+11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

6.01%

+11.55%

LMCLX vs. BERIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMCLX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than BERIX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMCLX vs. BERIX - Dividend Comparison

LMCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than BERIX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BERIX
Chartwell Income Fund
4.06%3.97%3.90%3.36%3.54%2.58%3.07%3.03%5.83%5.22%2.76%2.45%
LMCLX
Miller Income Fund
3.36%3.59%4.28%5.81%6.33%5.52%6.04%8.23%9.22%7.97%8.54%8.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMCLX and BERIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMCLX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to BERIX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMCLX dropped -44.81% vs BERIX's -20.34%.

BERIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMCLX and BERIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer