LLYH.TO vs. LLY
LLYH.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) is Dividend fund actively managed by Harvest, while LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) is a stock. Over the past year, LLYH.TO returned 39.69% vs 46.57% for LLY. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
LLYH.TO vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LLYH.TO is traded in CAD, while LLY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LLY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLYH.TO achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 2.00% return.
LLYH.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLY
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 13.87%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 46.57%
- 3Y*
- 37.14%
- 5Y*
- 45.16%
- 10Y*
- 33.62%
LLYH.TO vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 3.76% | 24.63% | -11.16% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 2.00% | 33.81% | -14.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLYH.TO and LLY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LLYH.TO and LLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLYH.TO vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
LLYH.TO
LLY
LLYH.TO vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLYH.TO | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.84 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | 4.49 | +0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLYH.TO | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.05 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
LLYH.TO vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -35.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLYH.TO and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLYH.TO | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.00% | -35.96% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.97% | -25.44% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -3.90% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -7.21% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 10.40% | -2.76% |
Volatility
LLYH.TO vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) is 6.85%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that LLYH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLYH.TO | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 9.40% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.78% | 26.91% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.04% | 37.85% | -4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 32.81% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 30.23% | +3.59% |
Dividends
LLYH.TO vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
LLYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%, more than LLY's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.60% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 17.81% | 17.54% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, LLYH.TO and LLY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for LLYH.TO and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer