PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLY vs. RGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LLY vs. RGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLY achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than RGR's 18.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LLY has outperformed RGR with an annualized return of 33.71%, while RGR has yielded a comparatively lower -0.07% annualized return.


LLY

1D
1.57%
1M
21.37%
YTD
7.29%
6M
15.58%
1Y
50.32%
3Y*
38.07%
5Y*
39.75%
10Y*
33.71%

RGR

1D
-0.80%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
18.37%
6M
18.77%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
-8.15%
5Y*
-9.67%
10Y*
-0.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLY vs. RGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
7.29%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%
RGR
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
18.37%-6.13%-20.91%-8.04%-15.41%9.30%50.28%-10.14%-2.84%8.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LLY and RGR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 1993

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LLY:

$1.03T

RGR:

$624.87M

EPS

LLY:

$28.14

RGR:

-$0.73

PS Ratio

LLY:

14.28

RGR:

1.14

PB Ratio

LLY:

33.00

RGR:

2.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

LLY:

$72.25B

RGR:

$551.68M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LLY:

$59.75B

RGR:

$79.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

LLY:

$32.97B

RGR:

-$2.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLY vs. RGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

RGR
RGR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLY vs. RGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLYRGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.08

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.21

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

0.47

+4.85

LLY vs. RGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the RGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLY and RGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLYRGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

0.23

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

-0.32

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

-0.00

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.21

+0.37

Drawdowns

LLY vs. RGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLY drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, smaller than the maximum RGR drawdown of -79.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLY and RGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLYRGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.24%

-79.69%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

-38.79%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.48%

-46.00%

+11.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-60.59%

+26.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

-60.59%

+26.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-47.12%

+47.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.22%

-31.96%

+12.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.49%

17.56%

-8.07%

Volatility

LLY vs. RGR - Volatility Comparison

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) at 7.14%. This indicates that LLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLYRGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

7.14%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.05%

19.49%

+7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.16%

35.49%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.54%

30.36%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.18%

33.10%

-2.92%

Dividends

LLY vs. RGR - Dividend Comparison

LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than RGR's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
RGR
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
1.01%1.90%1.95%2.79%14.66%4.94%10.00%1.74%2.07%2.44%3.28%1.85%

Financials

LLY vs. RGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eli Lilly and Company and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
19.80B
141.36M
(LLY) Total Revenue
(RGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LLY vs. RGR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Eli Lilly and Company and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.0%
19.9%
Portfolio components
LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

RGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.08M and revenue of 141.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.9%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

RGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.95M and revenue of 141.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.

RGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 128.00K and revenue of 141.36M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LLY and RGR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLY has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to RGR (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLY dropped -68.24% vs RGR's -79.69%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLY and RGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer