LLDYX vs. FCNVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX).
LLDYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Oct 19, 2004. FCNVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 3, 2011.
Performance
LLDYX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LLDYX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund | -0.21% | 6.19% | 5.59% | 5.41% | -5.35% | 1.07% | 3.17% | 5.64% | 1.47% | 2.74% |
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 0.52% | 4.51% | 5.43% | 5.86% | 0.85% | -0.06% | 1.10% | 3.00% | 1.82% | 1.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLDYX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than FCNVX's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LLDYX has outperformed FCNVX with an annualized return of 2.81%, while FCNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.51% annualized return.
LLDYX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
FCNVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LLDYX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLDYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LLDYX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank
LLDYX
FCNVX
LLDYX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLDYX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 3.18 | -1.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 14.52 | -11.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 6.34 | -4.82 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 21.58 | -17.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 84.59 | -70.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLDYX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 3.18 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 2.69 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | 2.44 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 2.17 | -1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between LLDYX and FCNVX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LLDYX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison
LLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than FCNVX's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.16% | 4.71% | 2.58% | 2.52% | 3.06% | 3.79% | 4.11% | 3.90% | 4.15% | 4.15% |
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 3.91% | 4.41% | 5.17% | 4.97% | 1.24% | 0.24% | 0.99% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 1.01% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
LLDYX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLDYX drawdown since its inception was -10.54%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDYX and FCNVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLDYX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -2.19% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -0.20% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.43% | -0.59% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.67% | -2.19% | -7.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.10% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -0.05% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 0.05% | +0.29% |
Volatility
LLDYX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.10%. This indicates that LLDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LLDYX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 0.10% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.55% | 0.81% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64% | 1.28% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 1.27% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.58% | 1.03% | +1.55% |