PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKOR vs. MILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKOR vs. MILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKOR achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than MILK's 2.43% return.


LKOR

1D
0.09%
1M
1.30%
YTD
1.10%
6M
0.46%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
-1.36%
10Y*
2.49%

MILK

1D
0.03%
1M
1.03%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.03%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKOR vs. MILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund
1.10%7.04%-0.97%
MILK
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
2.43%7.49%-0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LKOR and MILK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.94

The correlation between LKOR and MILK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKOR vs. MILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKOR
LKOR Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MILK
MILK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKOR vs. MILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKORMILKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

1.89

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

2.74

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.34

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

2.55

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.54

9.20

-5.66

LKOR vs. MILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the MILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKOR and MILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKORMILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.89

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.00

-0.74

Drawdowns

LKOR vs. MILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKOR drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than MILK's maximum drawdown of -6.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKOR and MILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKORMILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-6.16%

-28.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-3.75%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.32%

0.00%

-13.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-1.09%

-9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.04%

+1.17%

Volatility

LKOR vs. MILK - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) at 1.60%. This indicates that LKOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKORMILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

1.60%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

3.81%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

5.21%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.90%

6.69%

+6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

6.69%

+6.53%

LKOR vs. MILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MILK's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKOR vs. MILK - Dividend Comparison

LKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than MILK's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund
5.70%5.57%5.52%4.90%4.71%4.73%6.56%3.71%4.21%3.77%5.53%1.22%
MILK
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
7.02%6.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LKOR and MILK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LKOR has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to MILK (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKOR dropped -34.78% vs MILK's -6.16%.

On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 9.79% vs 8.19% for LKOR. On fees, LKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, MILK has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 9.79% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 5.70% for LKOR.

LKOR tracks Northern Trust US Long Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for LKOR and 0.49% for MILK.

MILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKOR and MILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer