PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKOR vs. ICVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LKOR vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LKOR vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund
-0.80%7.04%-1.02%11.64%-25.55%-1.51%16.00%23.97%-7.61%13.87%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
3.58%18.10%10.61%15.35%-20.66%-0.66%61.01%21.76%-0.27%16.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKOR achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, LKOR has underperformed ICVT with an annualized return of 2.68%, while ICVT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


LKOR

1D
0.89%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
-0.80%
6M
-1.40%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
2.68%

ICVT

1D
2.66%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
3.58%
6M
2.56%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LKOR vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LKOR vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKOR
LKOR Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
LKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ICVT
ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKOR vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKORICVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

1.71

-1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

2.33

-1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

3.10

-2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.81

10.57

-8.76

LKOR vs. ICVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the ICVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKOR and ICVT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKORICVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.71

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.27

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.79

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.67

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between LKOR and ICVT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LKOR vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison

LKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than ICVT's 1.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund
5.72%5.57%5.52%4.90%4.71%4.73%6.56%3.71%4.21%3.77%5.53%1.22%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
1.62%1.73%2.19%1.85%1.93%7.70%3.98%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%

Drawdowns

LKOR vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKOR drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, roughly equal to the maximum ICVT drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKOR and ICVT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LKORICVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-33.25%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.63%

-7.55%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.78%

-29.95%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-33.25%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.96%

-3.67%

-11.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-9.64%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.21%

+0.18%

Volatility

LKOR vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) is 3.92%, while iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that LKOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LKORICVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

6.74%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

11.65%

-6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

14.02%

-3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

13.20%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

15.54%

-2.32%