LKOR vs. MLN
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN).
LKOR and MLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LKOR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust US Long Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2015. MLN is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg AMT-Free Long Continuous. It was launched on Jan 2, 2008. Both LKOR and MLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LKOR or MLN.
Correlation
The correlation between LKOR and MLN is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LKOR vs. MLN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LKOR:
-0.03
MLN:
0.14
LKOR:
0.02
MLN:
0.22
LKOR:
1.00
MLN:
1.03
LKOR:
-0.02
MLN:
0.06
LKOR:
-0.10
MLN:
0.65
LKOR:
3.71%
MLN:
1.30%
LKOR:
10.54%
MLN:
6.00%
LKOR:
-34.78%
MLN:
-28.36%
LKOR:
-19.49%
MLN:
-10.95%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LKOR achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than MLN's 0.44% return.
LKOR
-0.49%
-1.04%
0.70%
-0.35%
-1.15%
N/A
MLN
0.44%
-1.02%
0.66%
0.89%
-0.48%
1.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LKOR vs. MLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MLN's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LKOR vs. MLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LKOR vs. MLN - Dividend Comparison
LKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than MLN's 3.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund | 5.49% | 4.89% | 4.71% | 4.73% | 6.56% | 3.71% | 4.21% | 3.78% | 5.53% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF | 3.61% | 3.19% | 2.67% | 2.52% | 2.69% | 2.87% | 3.09% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 3.39% | 3.78% | 4.43% |
Drawdowns
LKOR vs. MLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LKOR drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than MLN's maximum drawdown of -28.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKOR and MLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LKOR vs. MLN - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) at 2.16%. This indicates that LKOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.