PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LJUL vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LJUL vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LJUL vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LJUL achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's -1.41% return.


LJUL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.83%
6M
2.16%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POCT

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
0.32%
1Y
13.95%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LJUL vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LJUL and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

LJUL vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LJUL
LJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LJUL vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LJULPOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

1.02

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

1.55

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.25

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.54

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.27

8.24

+8.03

LJUL vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LJUL and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LJULPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.02

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.79

+0.91

Correlation

The correlation between LJUL and POCT is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LJUL vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, while POCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
LJUL
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July
5.29%5.36%2.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Drawdowns

LJUL vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LJUL drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LJUL and POCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LJULPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-18.80%

+15.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-4.40%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.32%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-1.53%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

1.35%

-1.00%

Volatility

LJUL vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) is 0.76%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that LJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LJULPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

3.26%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.30%

5.15%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

10.35%

-6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

7.90%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.39%

10.31%

-6.92%