LIWPX vs. VTMFX
LIWPX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both mutual funds - LIWPX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock, while VTMFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, LIWPX returned 10.44%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for VTMFX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LIWPX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VTMFX.
Performance
LIWPX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIWPX achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 6.03% return.
LIWPX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- —
VTMFX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 6.03%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 16.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
LIWPX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund | 13.09% | 21.32% | 14.17% | 21.22% | -18.52% | 18.51% | 15.12% | 5.67% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 6.03% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIWPX and VTMFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between LIWPX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIWPX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
LIWPX
VTMFX
LIWPX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIWPX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.55 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.22 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | 15.40 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIWPX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.83 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.86 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.85 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
LIWPX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIWPX drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIWPX and VTMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIWPX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -28.49% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -5.38% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.97% | -10.61% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.57% | -17.40% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -3.55% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.12% | +1.03% |
Volatility
LIWPX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 1.70%. This indicates that LIWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIWPX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 1.70% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 4.75% | +5.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 6.13% | +6.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 8.52% | +7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 9.12% | +9.44% |
LIWPX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIWPX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIWPX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
LIWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than VTMFX's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund | 1.38% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 1.50% | 1.58% | 1.13% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.10% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, LIWPX and VTMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LIWPX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to VTMFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIWPX dropped -33.12% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.
VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIWPX and VTMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer